Skip to main content

There is no such thing as "your" tax dollars

A refrain we sometimes hear is, "I don't want my tax money going to (insert program here)." This attitude betrays an inherent misunderstanding of what taxation is. Taxes are not a subscription you pay for a service you want to receive. Taxation is not a business transaction. You cannot cancel your subscription, and you cannot ask for a refund (unless you were overcharged). 

No, taxes are the rent you pay for living in society.

Do you have a say in how these monies are used? Of course you do! We all have a say in how public monies should be used, and that voice is expressed through our representatives in our state legislatures and our Congresspersons. It would be manifestly unjust for the government to tax us and then not give us a say in how those taxes are used. America was in many ways founded on this principle!

The point is, we all have a say. Taxes should be used for the benefit of all. Which means that some tax monies are going to be used on things that you yourself don't benefit from, but others of your fellow citizens do. To say that "your" tax dollars shouldn't go to that thing just because you yourself don't want or need it is to effectively say that your wants and needs are more important than other people's. Spoiler alert: they're not. So stop saying that.

Some may say, "Well, I don't want to live in society!" If you want to bow out of the obligations of society, that is your prerogative. But if you do, you can't claim any of the benefits of society. In other words: 
  • You can't use the electrical grid, the water supply, natural gas lines, or the sewer system. These are run by commercial entities, but were granted the right to administer utilities in your area by the government, and are significantly subsidized by government funds. 
  • You cannot use the roads or any of the government-mandated safety devices in your car. 
  • You cannot call the fire department if your property is threatened by disaster.
  • You cannot call the police to protect you from any threats to your person or property. 
  • You cannot use the courts to pursue any criminal or civil matters, so you can't sue anyone who cheats you in a business deal, or press charges against anyone who attacks you or steals from you. 
  • You will have to operate your own landfill, since you cannot use the government-run one. 
  • You cannot buy food or medication from a store, because they are inspected and regulated by a host of government agencies that make sure they are safe and effective. 
  • You cannot listen to weather reports, including hurricane, tornado, wildfire, flood, or tsunami warnings, as weather data is collected by government satellites and provided to the public by government agencies.
  • You cannot live in a house built by a general contractor or a construction company, as they will have employed government-mandated safety standards and inspections.
  • You cannot enter any office buildings for the same reasons.
  • Neither you nor your immediate family may attend any public, private, or charter school or university, as all these receive government funds, and you cannot receive any government monies for homeschooling.
  • You cannot expect any legal recognition of your marriage, as that requires a government certificate issued by a government-authorized officiator.
  • You cannot patent or copyright anything, and anyone is free to copy anything you invent, write, or create and pass it off as their own at any time.
  • You cannot use a mobile network, Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, or watch broadcast TV or listen to the radio, as over-the-air communication frequencies are regulated by the government.
  • You cannot go to any national or state parks.
  • Your employer can legally work you as many hours as they wish, with no expectation of overtime pay or a safe work environment.
  • If your bank fails, your money is completely gone: no government-backed insurance can reimburse you.
I am not suggesting that you 'show more gratitude' to the government, or that we should somehow be required to approve of everything the government does. That would be absurd. And it is very reasonable to object to spending money on things that you don't believe are in the public interest. But please stop talking about "your" tax dollars - that's not a thing.

Popular posts from this blog

An Open Letter to Congress: Freedom from Unreasonableness

When the United States announced the Declaration of Independence in 1776, they had very specific injustices they were protesting and that they listed as the reasons why King George III should no longer be allowed to rule over them. An incomplete list of the king’s sins were: Limiting immigration Creating new & wasteful government departments  Using the military to enforce the law Restricting trade Altering the forms and institutions of government Protecting his loyalists from punishment for unlawful acts Refusing to implement laws and measures that would serve the public good Refusing to take action on matters that pose immediate threats Many decades later, an unknown headline author for The Chicago Tribune wrote , “History May Not Repeat, But It Looks Alike.” 2025 is not 1776. But there are significant similarities between how Americans felt about George III in 1776 and how we should feel about Donald Trump in 2025. All of the grievances listed above would apply to Donald Trum...

Harmful Conformity Groups in America: Examples

When we think of harmful conformity groups we often think of religious movements. There have definitely been some infamous and awful examples over the years, such as Jonestown, the Branch Davidians, and Heaven’s Gate. But there are plenty of examples outside the realm of religion. The atheistic philosopher Ayn Rand was the leader of a society in New York City in the 1960s that displayed many of the features of a HCG. The self-help organization NXIVM had little to no religious dimensions and was undeniably an HCG, as was the wellness company OneTaste. We will discuss each of these groups in rough chronological order. The Collective Ayn Rand, most famous for her fiction books The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged , thought of herself as a philosopher first and a novelist second. The ideas that she formulated with these novels eventually grew into an ideological framework she called Objectivism. In the 1960s, she was living in New York and attracted other like-minded people with her writing...